Or you could open another instance, let C4D crawl on a thread, while working on something different with another C4D instance. You could take a coffee and watch C4D-TV. This happens sometimes and can be very frustrating. When it crashes, you got a total mess with lot's of different rendered frames, as C4D can't handle abribtrary frame definitions, nor skip existing frames.Īnother use case: You have to do severall single-threaded-operations in C4D, which will take a LOT of time. So you could convert the STEP File in your open C4D Instance. Nothing special, nothing CPU-heavy, but time consunimg and crash-prone (with some CAD data, I can tell). One use case for multiple Programm Instances: You're rendering via Team Renderer, because Team Server s***s even more.
Last time I checked, the parallel command didn't work. But you still could switch to blender and voice your discomfort about Maxons Moves. They shouldn't forget what it's all about. The only question left was "How could the company sell this as an advantage to the customer". It was commonly agreed, that the subscription model brings more money and binds customers way better, while not having any need for ground-breaking updates.
#Moi3d subd plugin software#
In the books the paying customers are the happy ones.Īs a UI/UX Consultant for a software company, and a small-percentage-shareholder of the same, I attended all critical business meetings. Voicing an unpleasant opinion and paying the money is fine for the company. In my opinion, the only way to make yourself heard, is by means of money. It's not exactly tiring to read about it, it's tiring to contribute to it. What did Adobe do? Ignore all this and just ramp up the marketing budget. And we all ranted about that year after year. It just reminds me of the Adobe move nearly a decade back. I'm actually unhappy with C4D updates and the subscription model.